Hospital) should not have been included in the cost of the Institution with a view to the apportionment of the Admiralty contribution. On the other hand, I am unable to concur in the deduction which Dr Lloyd would appear desirous of making, viz.: the rent of the Hospital.
For this is actually paid by the Government, and even when it ceases to be paid on the removal of the Hospital to a new building, it is not to be forgotten that building has cost a sum, the interest of which is fully equal to the rent.
On the whole, however, I agree in the view expressed by Dr Lloyd and adopted by Commodore Lush that the contribution which it is proposed for the Admiralty...
Hospital) should not have
been included in the cost of the Institution with a Kiew to the apportionment of the hamiralty contribution On the other hand I am unable
A
to concur in the deduction which Di Lloyd would appear desirous of making, siz: the rent of the Hospital.
For this is actually faid by the foot and even when it ceases to be paid on the removal of the Hospital to afoo! Build it is not to be for gotten that building has which is fully equal to the len
cost a sum
the interest of
On the whole, however, Lagree in the view expressed
by Dr Lloyd and
adopted
pore (hurch that the
by Commodore C
contribution which it is
proposed for the Admiralty
い
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.